editorial queries about URLs

This week I’m responding to editorial queries about our upcoming book. The copy editor has done a fantastic job cleaning up awkward phrasing and correcting citations. The copy editor noted that several of the URLs we cited in the book no longer exist, and asked me to provide corrected URLs. I went to Google to find where they may have relocated themselves and was unable to find ANY of them. It’s like they never existed. Sigh. Such is permanence in this digital age. I suppose this is a good thing to keep in mind for future publications: cite a URL if you have to, but make sure to explain the content of the web site in your text well enough because by the time your reader is looking at your publication the URL likely no longer exists.

wonka

http://cheezburger.com/6399386112

Posted in writing | 2 Comments

The issues keep on rolling in

The library renews its subscriptions to print journals in the summer, so that by the fall our subscription vendor can place the renewals with the hundreds of publishers or suppliers we get the journals from. Using this time line of reviewing our titles in the early summer, updating our vendor database with our renewal decisions in late summer, and the vendor placing the renewals in the fall is all designed to make our renewal for the next calendar year seamless. The idea is that we don’t want to miss a single issue of a journal, and generally if we use this workflow we don’t miss any.

At the beginning of the new calendar year when our check-in staff person receives an issue of a journal to which we’ve canceled a subscription, she’ll toss it in a box under her desk. By the end of February the box is usually full. This means that the publisher or supplier didn’t get the message until it was too late that we intended to cancel, and they’ll send us one or two more issues of a journal before their own databases are updated with the cancellation.

Occasionally we’ll continue to get issues past those one or two hangers-on, and that usually signifies a problem, often that we told the vendor not to renew but the publisher didn’t get the message; they think we still have an active subscription. When this happens we send the issues back in order not to be invoiced for a title we didn’t want to receive. By March this kind of thing is normally all figured out. Except this year. Here’s a pile that we’re still getting. To be investigated!

unwanted journals

 

Posted in library, management | Comments Off on The issues keep on rolling in

my office, where the e-magic happens

At my first professional librarian position I sat in a cubicle in the basement, near the loading dock. The office had a megaphone in case we needed it for an earthquake emergency. The office I’m in at LMU is much, much nicer. Also, no megaphone.

 

Marie's office

 

Posted in library | Comments Off on my office, where the e-magic happens

Y U NO

http://memegenerator.net/instance/22316440

Y U NO

Posted in license agreements | Comments Off on Y U NO

our e-resource management system turns 2

Happy birthday, ERM! Two years ago today we met our trainer from Innovative Interfaces to set up the new module that would help us manage our growing collection of electronic resources. Here we are, two years later, with a fully developed module that integrates seamlessly with our catalog and provides our patrons with rights & restrictions information about e-resources in a proactive way.

Two year candle

(via http://www.alegriphotos.com/Two_year_candle_on_birthday_cake-photo-c14e4f986fe8930683dd4cc4d9d30be3.html)

And many mooooooore…

Posted in e-resource mgmt, library, license agreements | Comments Off on our e-resource management system turns 2

tracking access fees

Sometimes my job is all about the small things. For example, I am sometimes asked how much we spend annually in access fees for e-content. Access fees (or “hosting fees”) are charged by a vendor once you have purchased e-content but want to continue viewing the content on a third-party platform rather than hosting it yourself. You’re asking yourself, “Who would want to host a bunch of disparate content on their own? Of COURSE we would want the vendor to keep all those e-books/e-journals/databases on the existing platform.” I know, it’s nutty. It’s also expensive. Sometimes we pay thousands of dollars to access content we’ve already bought. The library world is a strange place.

So, how much do we spend on all this stuff annually? I’ll tell you next year. We just created a fund code for Access Fees and I’m in the process of creating new order records that are tied to this fund. At the end of the year I’ll be able to run a report that shows how much money we spent in that fund. Hooray!

Posted in e-resource mgmt | Comments Off on tracking access fees