disaster planning for e-resources

When a major content provider goes down, social networks light up with alerts from people noticing the problem, cries of alarm from students trying to finish last-minute projects, and reports from librarians of calls with database sales representatives with the story of why the resources are down. Earlier this week our main database provider, EBSCO, went offline unexpectedly due to an error on their system back end. Curiously missing from the usual network of communication was any contact from the provider. Not a peep, not on twitter, facebook, or e-mail.

From a library perspective, when a major content provider goes down, it is a legitimate disaster. For electronic resources librarians, all the usual work stops and crisis management mode takes over. At my institution we alert all library staff via e-mail of the problem to let them know we are aware of the problem and are monitoring it, we update our public services wiki so that staff sitting at service points like the circulation desk and reference desk are aware. As we get more information we send out follow-up e-mails to our library staff. When the problem is resolved we alert them that way, too. During the day we follow twitter, facebook, and the lsw page on friendfeed to see what other librarians are saying, to get any hints of information that may be helpful to our patrons. Unfortunately for all of us, we did it all this week without the help of EBSCO.

I’ve sent a note to our database sales rep outlining what I’d like to see when e-resource problems arise, and she graciously acknowledged the note noting that she would forward to her director for consideration. In the meantime, however, damage has been done. Choice tweets were plucked from the twittersphere, highlighting the frustration of library patrons trying to access the downed resources, collated at http://storify.com/jeremygsnell/ebsco-the-reckoning. What a shame that we weren’t able to respond to their concerns with any real information about the problem. I wonder if a degree of trust patrons have with their libraries has been broken as a result of this.

We’ve taken the opportunity here to examine our own disaster planning process for when something like this happens again. There are a variety of options for communicating outages and problem resolutions. I wonder which of these your institution uses:
e-mail to library staff
e-mail to university
e-mails to faculty liaisons
blog post
note on the main library web page
alerts in the ILS
facebook
twitter

When I’m back from ER&L I’ll be drafting a communication plan for how the library will respond when an individual resource goes down as well as when a suite of resources goes down. Do you already have such a document? If so, please consider sharing.

 

Posted in e-resource mgmt, images, management | 1 Comment

annual statistical reporting

annual statistical reporting

inspired by http://ff.im/SKQm4.

Posted in e-resource mgmt, monkeys/bananas | Comments Off on annual statistical reporting

JSTOR content and “ownership”

Libraries have been in the process of weeding print journal titles in favor of the e-format for years now. Some libraries are using their JSTOR backfile collections as their guides for which print to discard; if the title is in JSTOR a library will withdraw the print from its collection. This seems an odd choice to me because libraries don’t own the e-content, it’s a subscription.

You can argue that in principle a library owns the content because it paid a collection archive fee when it began the subscription, but to access that owned content libraries have to continue to pay an annual access fee. If the library stops paying the access fee JSTOR promises to keep the collection for you, but they’re not going to let you see it. They do promise that if you stop paying the access fee for a while and then start up the subscription again later they won’t make you pay the archive fee again (see 7.1 Archiving of Back Issues near the bottom of http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp). How nice of them?

In essence libraries don’t own JSTOR content in a “gimme it now” kind of way, like e-journal publishers tend to provide. A perpetual access license through an e-journal publisher usually provides a clause with approval to make your own archival copy. Sure, you’ll have to store that content locally, but you can have it and know you’re holding something at the end of the day.

Has your library withdrawn print because you have the e-format of the same content via a JSTOR backfile collection? How have you reconciled this “owned, sort of” situation? When you made your withdrawal decisions did you know that JSTOR wasn’t owned content like our other usual e-journal packages?

 

Posted in e-resource mgmt, library, license agreements | Comments Off on JSTOR content and “ownership”

leap

risk

fail

engage

initiate

collaborate

listen

try
sf leap

Posted in writing | Comments Off on leap

transferred right into nonexistence

i talked to a publisher rep yesterday about the situation with transferred titles and i’m afraid it is more stomach-churning than i anticipated. we recently discovered that an e-journal title to which we should have perpetual (i.e., forever) access had not only moved to a different publisher (without notifying us), we now do not have access to the content at the new publisher. i wanted to find out more about how this transition usually goes so i asked a lot of nosy questions. i wanted to discover if this was an anomaly or the norm.

the publisher rep reported that most publisher/provider systems simply aren’t built to handle the kind of data required when a title moves from one publisher to another. if your institution has an individual e-journal title purchase not made through a consortium, you are in pretty good shape because their systems are built to handle that. if you license a package, and the package was negotiated by a consortium, then you are in sad, sad shape. it sounded to me like if your holdings were customized as part of a consortial purchase, you can pretty much kiss any guarantee of perpetual access goodbye.

the advice we were given was to keep an annual title list for all of your e-journal packages, keep a holdings list, and check access to those contents on a systematic basis. as i mentioned in a blog post last year, nobody’s keeping track of this stuff on your behalf. you don’t have a title list or a holdings list? ask for one. go. do it now, especially before you discard your print copies that duplicate the online content.

Posted in e-resource mgmt, license agreements | 2 Comments

photographs every day

my favorite part of the day is when i get to look in my rss feed for the new photographs my flickr contacts have made.

flickr image in google reader

 

leave your flickr handle in a comment so i can see what you’re up to.

p.s. i’m ORGMONKEY on flickr and i have an image blog at http://marie-kennedy.com

Posted in images | Comments Off on photographs every day