what my job title means

when i introduce myself professionally, i tell people that i am the head of metadata and content management at our library, which usually draws an, “i’m impressed” facial expression, and then the inevitable question, “what is that?”  have you been wondering the same thing?  here’s what it means:

my department is a one-stop shop for all back-end processes.  we buy all the books, e-books, journals, e-journals, and databases for our medical library and the dental library, pay for them, put them into the catalog, activate the electronic things, and monitor everything so it is accessible.  my department is commonly referred to as “technical services.”  i have a pretty fantastic staff that performs all these duties, leaving me to focus on how data are entered into the library catalog to keep the information consistent and neat, develop new ways to do things, and look at statistics.  a lot of my job is statistics: how many times was this e-journal used, how many books do we have in the library, how many journal issues entered the library last year.  those statistics point us to decide whether or not to renew a subscription, add more concurrent users for a popular e-book, or withdraw an old and unused book from the shelf.

i negotiate the license agreements for electronic resources at our library.  this task isn’t always performed by a technical services department, but i happen to have had some experience with licensing in the past and so took it on.  i also co-manage copyright issues for our library.  for fun i do original cataloging of items like spiral-bound flip books that stand on their own and have transparent sheets that lay on top of photographs of teeth.

my job is varied, and i am always amazed at how much one department can get done if it is well organized and supported.  so go on and keep your, “i’m impressed” face on!

Posted in library, management | 1 Comment

merry christmas

Christmas ecard
Christmas ecards by dumpr.net

Posted in monkeys/bananas | Comments Off on merry christmas

morgueFile

despite the squicky name this is a nice site for free image downloads.  the advanced search box is well composed and intuitive.

you must register to download images.

i did a basic search from their front page for diabetes and retrieved a series of images of a person testing his blood glucose.  in the retrieval set were several images of a dog, which initially seemed out of place.  i clicked on one of the dog images and saw that the description tells us that the dog, lucy, has diabetes.  aww…

Posted in images | Comments Off on morgueFile

happy monkey day!

check out this comics page, with pieces done in celebration of monkey day.

che monkey

the official monkey day page 

Posted in monkeys/bananas | Comments Off on happy monkey day!

baby’s first dossier review

i’ve been a librarian for almost two years now, and today is the first review of my continuing appointment (a.k.a. tenure) packet. this review is really just a informal procedural step during which a committee of my colleagues at the library takes a look at the big stack of papers i’ve given them that enumerate the various articles i’ve written, presentations i’ve done, committee work i’ve participated in, etc., and makes recommendations for what i should work on more or less. the end result is that the committee guides me toward becoming a well-rounded librarian, preparing me for the full dossier review in a few more years.

the american psychological association has a nice description of what the tenure process is all about.

Posted in library | Comments Off on baby’s first dossier review

an “interesting” challenge

i’ve noticed that the word interesting is beginning to increasingly creep into the conversations i have with my friends. “that article on metadata is interesting,” or “her new hairstyle is interesting.” when i hear someone else say it i usually ask, “what is it about x that you find interesting?” because without qualification the word is kind of a meaningless space filler. it doesn’t really tell you what the person really thinks. it reminds me of the undergrads i would lead in photography critiques, in which they would try to get away with describing someone’s photo with, “i like it.”

i’m challenging myself to eliminate the word interesting from my vocabulary for one day, just to see for myself how much i use it and if i can come up with more, um, interesting words instead. do you overuse the word interesting? join me in the challenge.

Posted in the grammar doctor checks in | Comments Off on an “interesting” challenge