Creative Commons in flickr

when you search the image site flickr under the groups tab for ‘creative commons’ you will get a results set with a lot of group pools with a specific focus.

how to search flickr for groups

my quick search retrieved

  • insects in creative commons
  • flowers in creative commons
  • nature in creative commons
  • architecture in creative commons

why do you care?

at some point you’ve worked on a powerpoint presentation and have looked to insert some images to jazz it up. flickr may be a good resource for this. the images that are in the “creative commons” pools are put there by photographers that want you to use their images. by looking in the ‘flowers in creative commons’ pool, for example, you will only find pictures of flowers, and only pictures with creative commons licenses.

when you find an image you like, scroll to the bottom right of the page to look at the license. here’s a screen shot of what it looks like:
creative commons screenshot
when you click your mouse on the ‘some rights reserved’ text you will be whisked to the creative commons website, which tells you what the restrictions on the image’s reuse are. in this case the photographer permits you to reuse the image as long as you credit him as the author. easy enough! please note that not all photographers permit you to reuse their images, and those images will have this text for their license:

all rights reserved

experiment with this now so the next time you’re preparing a presentation you’ll already know what kinds of images are in the creative commons pools, making your preparation that much easier.

Posted in images, OA | 2 Comments

to read: Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies

my library has recently been discussing the wealth of social technology possibilities, wondering how to effectively use them to communicate with our users. i’m pleased to be part of an organization that is thinking about this and have been doing some reading to find cases of successful implementation. i came across this quote from a blog post by a museum employee that is thinking about similar things:

Put simply, if you do engage, you[r] organisation will change. If you engage strategically then this change can be managed and paced appropriately.

the blog mentions a book that i will look into to think more about managing and pacing engagement:
Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies

Posted in library, management, social networking | Comments Off on to read: Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies

Nutrition Cafe

the website of the pacific science center has three nutrition games in their nutrition cafe: nutrition sleuth, grab a grape, have-a-bite cafe

the main site is flash-based (and means that i can’t provide you with direct links to the individual games), but a non-flash version is also available.

thanks to hippocratech for pointing me to nutrition sleuth.

Posted in food | Comments Off on Nutrition Cafe

how do you become a reviewer for a journal?

somebody asked me recently how one gets to be a reviewer for a library-related journal. here’s how you can do it:

  • to be a reviewer you have to have a publishing track record. what topics in librarianship do you care most about?  start writing about them and show your writing to as many people as can stand to look at it. this informal review process does great things for the quality of your manuscripts and also makes others aware of what you care about.  people remember these things.
  • be an expert on a topic. it doesn’t matter what it is, but if you know a lot about x and have written about it, journal editors will think of you when they get a manuscript on that topic.
  • find journals you care about. if you always dogear articles in a particular journal to read or think about later, this is a good sign.  do you agree with the journal’s mission?  as a reviewer you will be charged to evaluate manuscripts with that mission in mind, so it should jive with what you think is important.
  • read up on who is on the editorial board for your favorite journals. do you know any of the members of the board? drop them a line and let them know you’d like to be considered as a reviewer, and specify in which areas you are competent.

the idea behind peer review is that your skill set or knowledge of a topic is broad enough that you can comment with ease on ideas broached in a manuscript.  it means that you keep up with literature in the area of your interest and will be able to discern high quality from low quality in this area.  the goal of the peer review process is to be able to further the body of literature in an area.

leave a comment if you’ve got other suggestions to share about how to position yourself to become a reviewer.

Posted in publishers, writing | 1 Comment

blogging gang signs

okay, so it took a year and a half for this to come to my attention: bloggers are dangerous.

you’ve probably seen me flash a sign for the west side, the area in LA in which i live. i see in this graphic that the sign is also used for wordpress. i use wordpress so i won’t quibble over who used the sign first. 🙂 west side

if mla has official conference bloggers next year i think you can expect to see this sign demonstrated in person:
blog sign

Posted in monkeys/bananas | 1 Comment

truthiness in images

the chronicle of higher education has an intriguing post in yesterday’s edition, about fraudulent images used in scientific publications. the images discussed in the article were altered in a way that made it look like the results of the research were different than the actual results, but the researcher commented that she was simply, “trying to present it even better.”

if a researcher does alter an image, those changes should be noted in the caption, a footnote, or in the methods section. it is easy to note that “the contrast in this image was increased to demonstrate more clearly the difference between a and b.” if you think of an image as data, a researcher should be able to understand that he/she should disclose all changes to images just as he would note any statistical weighting to data.

how do we go about altering images in a way that maintains their integrity? i started a draft of do’s/don’ts at this wiki: http://orgmonkey.wetpaint.com/page/images+as+evidence. will you check it out and make changes or add new things to think about? i’d like to be able to hand a copy of this to researchers when i meet with them to assist in image preparation for publications.

Posted in images, publishers, wiki, writing | Comments Off on truthiness in images