a question with a complex answer: how many databases do we have?

My e-resources unit is frequently asked collection statistics questions. The two most popular are: how many databases do we have, and; how many journals do we have? As it turns out, these questions are surprisingly difficult to answer. Today let’s just tackle the “how many databases” question.

The databases listed on the library’s Research Databases web page aren’t all databases. Years ago, as the library began collecting databases and other e-content it needed somewhere to showcase the new and exciting access method to scholarship, so the hand-coded HTML-driven Research Databases page was born. Over time e-versions of newspapers were added to that page, as were e-encyclopedias, e-book collections, and even single title e-journals. We used to respond to the “how many databases” query by scrolling through the Research Databases page, counting each entry.

The purchase of the e-resource management system and the possibility of generating the content of the Research Databases page from that, rather than hand coding in HTML, gave us the opportunity to evaluate what was actually on the page. In 2011 the library came to terms with what content should actually be entered onto the page, creating a policy document titled: Research Databases Page Content Guidelines. I’ll paste the Guidelines at the end of this post so you can see what we grappled with. Of course there are exceptions to the rules because that’s the way this library rolls.

Our Research Databases page is much cleaner now, and this makes responding to the question of “how many” much easier to answer. We don’t scroll through anymore and count them; we’ve figured out how to query the system to get a response. It’s a work in progress, certainly, but we are headed in the right direction.

***

Here’s a link to a PDF of our Research Databases Page Content Guidelines: GUIDELINES

  1. The goal of the Research Databases page (http://linus.lmu.edu/search/y) is to present selected electronic resources both alphabetically and by subject in an easily comprehensible way for library users. The main use of the page is to enter databases, which we define as licensed resources that contain curated and edited content such as journal articles, newspapers, and images, suitable for academic research, selected by the library for use at LMU.
  2. Priority is given to resources in which we have invested money and/or licensed.
  3. For individual e-book titles to be listed, they must either be reference works or locally created.
  4. Listing e-journal vendor collections in the alphabetical list is not encouraged.  They will chiefly be collected in the section of the Research Databases page called Browse Database Types / Publisher Collection.

These are the definitions of the types of resources that may be entered on the Research Databases (RD) page.

Type of Resource

Description

Examples

Eligible for the RD page

Exceptions (reasoning)

Database/ Aggregator Single access point for digitized content including journals, newspapers, e-books, and other e-reference content
  • Academic Search Complete
  • ProQuest Research Library
  • Literature Resource Center

Yes

None
E-book, collection Product-specific access point through which a collection of e-books can be accessed
  • ebrary
  • Cambridge Histories Online
  • ENGnetBASE

Case by case

An e-book collection is eligible for the Research Databases page if the complete collection is not found in the catalog.
E-book, single title  (See #3 above) Direct link to a single e-book; can also be searched through a host platform or e-book collection

No

None
Reference works, collection Product-specific access point through which a collection of reference works can be accessed
  • Credo Reference
  • Oxford Reference Online
  • Gale Virtual Reference Library

Yes

None
Reference works, single title Direct link to an e-reference work; individual titles may also be searched through a host platform or e-book collection
  • Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology
  • CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics

Case by Case

Annee Philologique (high use)
Global Books in Print (high use)
Serials Directory (high use)
Ulrichsweb (high use)
E-journal, collection (See #4 above) Product-specific access point through which a complete collection of e-journals can be accessed
  • bepress Journals
  • JSTOR
  • Project Muse

Case by Case

JSTOR (high use)
Project Muse (high use)
SAGE Journals Online (high use)
Science Direct (high use)
Emerald (high use)
E-journal, single title Direct link to a single e-journal; can also be searched through a host platform or e-journal collection.

No

CQ Researcher (high use)
Newspaper, collection Product-specific access point through which a collection of newspapers can be accessed
  • Newspaper Source
  • ProQuest Historical Newspapers

Yes

None
Newspaper, single title Direct link to a single newspaper; can also be searched through a host platform or newspaper collection

No

None
Free Internet resource Web-based database freely available on the Web
  • THOMAS
  • Making of America

TBD

For future discussion

 

Posted in e-resource mgmt | 2 Comments

job-related tasks in gantt format

This year is a busy one at work, probably more work than I can reasonably handle. There’s a lot of good projects I’ve identified that I hate to have wait, so I decided to give it my best shot by planning them out throughout the upcoming year. I used ganttproject to identify the tasks and the length of time I think I’ll need to complete each one. I’ve used the program before for group-wide projects, but never for my own personal work planning. Once I added in all of my tasks (my work “year” begins in June, but functionally began this year on July 12) I exported to Excel and printed out a little copy I keep on my file cabinet, where I can highlight tasks I’ve started and put a check mark next to tasks I have completed. So far it’s been helpful to be able to visualize my major projects for the year in this quick-glance view. You can see that working on perpetual access title lists for all of our publisher e-packages is going to take the most time. I’m also committed to becoming an Excel wizard, so I’ve set aside training time throughout this year to learn as much as I can about the program. We’ll see how this process goes. Check back later!

If you’ve successfully found a mechanism to keep your big tasks on track throughout the year, leave a comment. I’d love to hear how other people manage this.

Posted in e-resource mgmt | Comments Off on job-related tasks in gantt format

editorial queries about URLs

This week I’m responding to editorial queries about our upcoming book. The copy editor has done a fantastic job cleaning up awkward phrasing and correcting citations. The copy editor noted that several of the URLs we cited in the book no longer exist, and asked me to provide corrected URLs. I went to Google to find where they may have relocated themselves and was unable to find ANY of them. It’s like they never existed. Sigh. Such is permanence in this digital age. I suppose this is a good thing to keep in mind for future publications: cite a URL if you have to, but make sure to explain the content of the web site in your text well enough because by the time your reader is looking at your publication the URL likely no longer exists.

wonka

http://cheezburger.com/6399386112

Posted in writing | 2 Comments

The issues keep on rolling in

The library renews its subscriptions to print journals in the summer, so that by the fall our subscription vendor can place the renewals with the hundreds of publishers or suppliers we get the journals from. Using this time line of reviewing our titles in the early summer, updating our vendor database with our renewal decisions in late summer, and the vendor placing the renewals in the fall is all designed to make our renewal for the next calendar year seamless. The idea is that we don’t want to miss a single issue of a journal, and generally if we use this workflow we don’t miss any.

At the beginning of the new calendar year when our check-in staff person receives an issue of a journal to which we’ve canceled a subscription, she’ll toss it in a box under her desk. By the end of February the box is usually full. This means that the publisher or supplier didn’t get the message until it was too late that we intended to cancel, and they’ll send us one or two more issues of a journal before their own databases are updated with the cancellation.

Occasionally we’ll continue to get issues past those one or two hangers-on, and that usually signifies a problem, often that we told the vendor not to renew but the publisher didn’t get the message; they think we still have an active subscription. When this happens we send the issues back in order not to be invoiced for a title we didn’t want to receive. By March this kind of thing is normally all figured out. Except this year. Here’s a pile that we’re still getting. To be investigated!

unwanted journals

 

Posted in library, management | Comments Off on The issues keep on rolling in

my office, where the e-magic happens

At my first professional librarian position I sat in a cubicle in the basement, near the loading dock. The office had a megaphone in case we needed it for an earthquake emergency. The office I’m in at LMU is much, much nicer. Also, no megaphone.

 

Marie's office

 

Posted in library | Comments Off on my office, where the e-magic happens

Y U NO

http://memegenerator.net/instance/22316440

Y U NO

Posted in license agreements | Comments Off on Y U NO